by Jilene Haas, PharmD Candidate; Michael Ernst, PharmD, BCGP, FCCP; and Michelle Fravel, PharmD, BCPS, FCCP, University of Iowa College of Pharmacy
As of October 2022, nearly 100,000 mobile health applications (apps) were available for download from the Apple App Store and Google Play Store.1,2 These apps span a wide range of intended uses, from improving general well-being and fitness to medication adherence and aiding in the control of a disease. Pharmacists in the ambulatory care setting are increasingly likely to encounter patients using mobile health apps in their day-to-day practice. A survey conducted in January 2023 found that 40% of U.S. adults used at least one mobile health app, an increase from 34% in 2018.3 As the use of mobile health apps grows, it is important to understand how they are regulated and to identify apps with evidence of safety, accuracy, and effectiveness.
Federal Food and Drug Regulation of Medical Devices and Software Applications
In the United States, only a small subset of mobile health apps are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA has regulatory authority over medical devices; however, not all mobile health apps meet the FDA’s definition of a medical device. Mobile health apps are considered medical devices only if they incorporate software functionality that is intended to diagnose a disease or health condition, or cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent a disease.4 Software functions that meet the definition of a medical device are subject to FDA oversight regardless of the platform on which they run (e.g., mobile phone, tablet, smartwatch). The vast majority of mobile health apps on the market do not meet the FDA’s definition of a medical device, including apps to log, record, track, evaluate, or make behavioral suggestions related to general fitness, health, or wellness.4,5 In addition, apps that allow a user to record data (e.g., blood glucose, blood pressure, heart rate, weight) to share with a healthcare professional are not considered medical devices. Some medical devices, such as certain blood pressure cuffs or continuous glucose monitors, transmit data to an adjunct mobile health app – the associated app is considered a software component of the medical device and regulated as such.
The FDA regulates medical devices and mobile health apps based on the perceived risk to the user. Apps that pose low risk to patients are those intended to help patients self-manage their disease or health condition but do NOT provide specific treatment or treatment suggestions.4 Some examples include apps that coach patients with conditions such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, or obesity by promoting strategies for maintaining a healthy weight, optimal nutrition, exercise and fitness, managing salt intake, or prompting medication doses based on a pre-defined schedule.4 In the case of low-risk devices and apps, the FDA declines to enforce regulations. Examples of common mobile health apps that are considered low-risk and not regulated by the FDA include Noom®, MyFitnessPalTM, Headspace®, and Calm®.
The FDA’s regulatory oversight focuses on mobile health apps whose functionality poses a risk to a patient’s safety if the software fails to function as intended. These apps perform patient-specific analysis and provide diagnostic information or treatment recommendations to patients, caregivers, or other users who are not health care professionals.4 While smartwatches (e.g., Apple Watch®, Galaxy Watch®, Fitbit®) are not regulated as medical devices, certain smartwatch apps are regulated by the FDA due to their potential risk to a patient’s safety, including apps that function as an electrocardiograph to record heart rhythms or as a blood oxygen saturation sensor.4
When an app is subject to FDA oversight, it is assigned a regulatory class based on the level of control necessary to provide reasonable assurance of its safety and efficacy. Class I devices and apps are low risk and subjected to general controls; Class II are moderate risk, subjected to general and special controls; and Class III are high risk, subjected to general controls and require premarket approval.6,7 Due to their low risk, most Class I devices are exempt from premarket submission.6 Class II devices must demonstrate reasonable assurance of safety and efficacy, typically through a prospective clinical trial or by demonstrating substantial equivalence in function to an existing device previously cleared by the FDA.6,8 Class III devices must apply for premarket approval, which requires clinical studies showing that the device’s possible benefits outweigh the risks, in addition to significantly helping a large portion of the target population.6,9 The FDA differentiates between its multiple regulatory pathways by assigning different terms to devices, including “FDA-cleared”, “-granted”, “-authorized”, and “-approved”. Once mobile medical apps meet these regulatory requirements, they are subject to post-market monitoring similar to other medical devices, including adverse event reporting as well as potential recall and removal from the market.10
A small but unique subset of FDA-regulated mobile health apps are referred to as “digital therapeutics” (DTx). The term “digital therapeutic” is formally defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) as “health software intended to treat or alleviate a disease, disorder, condition, or injury by generating and delivering a medical intervention that has a demonstratable positive therapeutic impact on a patient’s health.”11 In addition to evaluating the safety and effectiveness for each digital therapeutic, the FDA determines whether a prescription is required to authorize its use by patients. When a prescription is required, the mobile health app is considered a prescription digital therapeutic (PDTx).7 This terminology distinguishes DTx and PDTx from the thousands of mobile health apps available on the market.11
As evidence-based therapeutic interventions, PDTx are a potential treatment option for a variety of diseases. They may be used as stand-alone treatments or concurrently with pharmacotherapy. The process to obtain a PDTx typically involves: (1) a clinician with prescribing authority writes a prescription for the product; (2) the prescription is sent either directly to the product manufacturer or a partnered platform to process payment; and (3) delivery of the physical PDTx or the mobile app authorization code to the patient. A recent analysis found that there were 20 FDA-regulated PDTx available on the market as of November 2022.12 Examples include mobile apps that help patients self-manage basal insulin titration and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions to improve irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms.7,13 Additional available PDTx include a video game mobile app that helps treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a hypnotherapy mobile app, and an intravaginal motion sensor and app-based software program that guides pelvic floor muscle training in patients with urinary incontinence. 7,13 See Table 1.
Table 1: Sample List of FDA-Regulated PDTx currently available in the United Statesa,b
PDTx Product (Manufacturer) | Therapeutic Area | Description | Supporting Evidence | How to Obtainb |
EndeavorRx®1 (Akili) | ADHD in patients aged 8-17 years | Immersive video game that targets attention and cognitive control via mobile app | Kollins et al.2,3 | $99 for 30-day prescription FSA/HSA eligible |
Freespira®4 (Freespira) | Panic disorder, PTSD | Breathing sensor paired with mobile app helps retrain breathing patterns | Ostacher et al.5Tolin et al.6Kaplan et al.7 | Available through VA, employers, health insurance Cost not published |
Insulia®8 (Voluntis) | T2DM | Self-management of basal insulin in adults with T2DM via mobile app | Franc et al.9Nevoret et al.10 | $0 for 12 months through Insulia Savings Programc |
iSage RxTM 11 (Amalgam Rx) | T2DM | Self-management of basal insulin in patients with T2DM aged ≥21 years via mobile app | Grdinovac et al.12Core titration algorithms studied in multiple trials13-18 | Cost not published |
Leva®19 (Axena Health) | Urinary incontinence | Vaginal motion sensor paired with mobile app guides pelvic floor muscle training in women | Weinstein et al.20,21 | Covered by Cigna Healthcare insurance Cost not published |
Luminopia®22 (Luminopia) | Amblyopia | Binocular therapy to rebalance optical input to the brain delivered via TV shows and movies on a VR headset | Xiao et al.23-25 | Cost not published Product website resources include billing codes and appeal templates |
Mahana IBSTM 26 (Mahana) | IBS | CBT to reduce IBS symptom severity delivered via mobile app | Everitt et al.27,28 | $199 for 90-day prescription FSA/HSA eligible |
NightWareTM 29 (NightWare) | PTSD-driven traumatic nightmares | Uses Apple Watch® sensors to analyze and interrupt nightmares without waking patient, improving sleep | Stephan et al.30Davenport et al.31 | Available through VA and DoD Cost not published |
Regulora®32 (metaMe Health) | IBS | Gut-directed hypnotherapy delivered via mobile app | Berry et al.33 | $75 for 90-day prescription (or lower if covered by insurance) |
RelieVRxTM 34 (Applied VR) | Chronic lower back pain | CBT delivered via VR headset for pain interference and reduction | Garcia et al.35,36 Maddox et al.37 | $0 for 8-week prescription with VA benefits Cost for non-VA not published |
a This list is not inclusive of all PDTx available in the U.S.; inclusion is not an endorsement from the authors.
b As of January 2024
c For patients with commercial health insurance
Payment and Insurance Coverage
The global market for PDTx was valued at USD 6.2 billion in 2023, but it is forecasted to grow to USD 32.5 billion by 2030.14 Despite this expected growth, there are barriers to the widespread use and adoption of PDTx in the United States. First, there is currently a relatively small number of FDA-regulated PDTx compared to other mobile health apps.5 Clinical trials and FDA review of PDTx take significant time and funding, so PDTx cannot come to market as quickly as non-regulated mobile health apps. Another barrier is the challenge for clinicians and patients to identify available PDTx.12 To compile a complete list would require cross-referencing multiple sources such as publicly available formularies; the Digital Therapeutics Alliance product library; the FDA’s 510(k) and De Novo databases; a web-based digital health repository known as Exits & Outcomes; and health news sources, like StatNews and the Pink Sheet.7,12 A third barrier is the current payment model for PDTx. Medicare generally does not pay for software products since there is no existing benefit category.8 The Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act is a bipartisan bill that was introduced in the Senate in 2022 and reintroduced in 2023, which aims to add PDTx to the list of services and products eligible for coverage under Medicare and Medicaid.12,13,15,16 In addition, the bill directs the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to establish product-specific billing codes for PDTx.13,15,16 A few PDTx manufacturers have worked independently with public or private insurers to obtain coverage for their products.13,17 While this is a start, the U.S. has been slow to address digital therapeutic reimbursement. In contrast, Germany, for example, lists all digital therapeutics on the DiGA directory (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, also known as Digital Health Applications in English), and these products are covered by all statutory health insurance plans.18
The Bottom Line
The vast majority of mobile health apps available to the general public in the U.S. are not regulated and, therefore, are not evaluated for safety or effectiveness. The FDA takes a risk-based approach, and currently, their regulatory focus is limited to those that meet their definition of a medical device and may pose a risk to patients if the software fails to function as intended. Prescription digital therapeutics are a small subset of health software that deliver evidence-based therapeutic interventions to patients. Even though there are barriers to the widespread adoption and use of PDTx in the U.S., it is important for pharmacists to understand how PDTx and mobile health apps are regulated. Mobile health apps and DTx/PDTx are likely to play a larger role in patient care in the future.
- Ceci L. Number of mHealth apps available in the Google Play Store from 1st quarter 2015 to 3rd quarter 2022. Infographic. Statista. Updated December 8, 2023. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/779919/health-apps-available-google-play-worldwide
- Ceci L. Number of mHealth apps available in the Apple App Store from 1st quarter 2015 to 3rd quarter 2022. Infographic. Statista. Updated December 8, 2023. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/779910/health-apps-available-ios-worldwide
- Zipp R. Use of Health Apps and Wearables Is Up. But Digital Health Still Has Room to Grow. Morning Consult Pro. Updated February 21, 2023. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://pro.morningconsult.com/trend-setters/use-of-digital-health-apps-wearables-growing
- Food and Drug Administration. Policy for Device Software Functions and Mobile Medical Applications: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Updated September 28, 2022. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/policy-device-software-functions-and-mobile-medical-applications
- Watson A, Chapman R, Shafai G, Maricich YA. FDA regulations and prescription digital therapeutics: Evolving with the technologies they regulate. Front Digit Health. 2023;5:1086219. Published 2023 Apr 17. doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1086219
- Food and Drug Administration. The Device Development Process- Step 3: Pathway to Approval. Updated February 9, 2018. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/patients/device-development-process/step-3-pathway-approval
- Shafai G, Aungst TD. Prescription digital therapeutics: A new frontier for pharmacists and the future of treatment. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023;63(4):1030-1034. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2023.03.012
- Digital Therapeutics Alliance. DTx Regulatory & Reimbursement Pathways. Infographic. Updated January 2022. Accessed January 16, 2024. https://dtxalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/US-Regulatory-and-Reimbursement-Pathways.pdf
- Food and Drug Administration. The Device Development Process- Step 4: FDA Device Review. Updated January 4, 2018. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/patients/device-development-process/step-4-fda-device-review
- Food and Drug Administration. The Device Development Process- Step 5: FDA Post-Market Device Safety Monitoring. Updated January 4, 2018. Accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/patients/device-development-process/step-5-fda-post-market-device-safety-monitoring
- Digital Therapeutics Alliance. DTA’s Adoption & Interpretation of ISO’s DTx Definition. Fact Sheet. Updated June 2023. Accessed January 16, 2024. https://dtxalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/DTA_FS_New-DTx-Definition.pdf
- Kumar A, Ross JS, Patel NA, Rathi V, Redberg RF, Dhruva SS. Studies Of Prescription Digital Therapeutics Often Lack Rigor And Inclusivity. Health Aff (Millwood). 2023;42(11):1559-1567. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00384
- Salsabili M, Tesell M, Alcusky M, et al. Prescription digital therapeutics: Applying Medicaid experience to value assessment and formulary management. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023;29(6):685-691. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.685
- Grand View Research. Digital Therapeutics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Application (Diabetes, Obesity, Smoking Cessation, Respiratory Disease), by End-use (Patients, Providers, Payers, Employers), by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2024-2030. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/digital-therapeutics-market
- Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2023, H.R. 1458, 118th Congress, 1st Sess. (2023).
- Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2023, S.723, 118th Congress, 1st Sess. (2023).
- Axena Health. Axena Health Receives Positive Insurance Coverage Decision from Cigna Healthcare for Lena Pelvic Health System. Published March 22, 2023. Accessed January 16, 2024. https://axenahealth.com/2023/03/axena-health-receives-positive-insurance-coverage-decision-from-cigna-healthcare-for-leva-pelvic-health-system/
- Digital Therapeutics Alliance. DTx Regulatory & Reimbursement Pathways: Germany. Fact Sheet. Updated January 2022. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://dtxalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Germany-Regulatory-and-Reimbursement-Pathways.pdf
- EndeavorRx®. EndeavorRx®. Accessed January 22, 2024. https://www.hcpendeavorrx.com
- Kollins SH, DeLoss DJ, Cañadas E, et al. A novel digital intervention for actively reducing severity of paediatric ADHD (STARS-ADHD): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(4):e168-e178. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30017-0
- Kollins SH, Childress A, Heusser AC, Lutz J. Effectiveness of a digital therapeutic as adjunct to treatment with medication in pediatric ADHD. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):58. Published 2021 Mar 26. doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00429-0
- Freespira®. How Freespira Works. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://freespira.com/
- Ostacher MJ, Fischer E, Bowen ER, Lyu J, Robbins DJ, Suppes T. Investigation of a Capnometry Guided Respiratory Intervention in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2021;46(4):367-376. doi:10.1007/s10484-021-09521-3
- Tolin DF, McGrath PB, Hale LR, Weiner DN, Gueorguieva R. A Multisite Benchmarking Trial of Capnometry Guided Respiratory Intervention for Panic Disorder in Naturalistic Treatment Settings. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2017;42(1):51-58. doi:10.1007/s10484-017-9354-4 I
- Kaplan A, Mannarino AP, Nickell PV. Evaluating the Impact of Freespira on Panic Disorder Patients’ Health Outcomes and Healthcare Costs within the Allegheny Health Network. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020;45(3):175-181. doi:10.1007/s10484-020-09465-0
- Insulia®. Meeth the Insulia App for People with Type 2 Diabetes. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://insulia.com
- Franc S, Joubert M, Daoudi A, et al. Efficacy of two telemonitoring systems to improve glycaemic control during basal insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: The TeleDiab-2 randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(10):2327-2332. doi:10.1111/dom.13806
- Nevoret C, Gervaise N, Delemer B, et al. The Effectiveness of an App (Insulia) in Recommending Basal Insulin Doses for French Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Longitudinal Observational Study. JMIR Diabetes. 2023;8:e44277. Published 2023 Mar 1. doi:10.2196/44277
- iSage RxTM. Empowering Patients to Follow Your Basal Insulin Dosing Plan. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://isageapp.com/healthcare.html
- Grdinovac K, Robbins D, Lavenbarg T, Levin P, Sysko R. 122-LB: iSage: Successful Basal Insulin Titration Managed by a Prescription-Only Digital Therapy for T2DM. Diabetes. 2019; 68: 122-LB. doi:10.2337/db19-122-LB
- Davies M, Storms F, Shutler S, Bianchi-Biscay M, Gomis R; ATLANTUS Study Group. Improvement of glycemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: comparison of two treatment algorithms using insulin glargine. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1282-1288. doi:10.2337/diacare.28.6.1282
- Gerstein HC, Yale JF, Harris SB, Issa M, Stewart JA, Dempsey E. A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with Type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas. The Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with Insulin Glargine for Hyperglycaemia Treatment) Study. Diabet Med. 2006;23(7):736-742. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01881.x
- Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J; Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3080-3086. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.11.3080
- Lüddeke HJ, Sreenan S, Aczel S, et al. PREDICTIVE- a global, prospective observational study to evaluate insulin detemir treatment in types 1 and 2 diabetes: baseline characteristics and predictors of hypoglycaemia from the European cohort. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9(3):428-434. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00677.x
- Riddle MC, Bolli GB, Ziemen M, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2755-2762. doi:10.2337/dc14-0991
- Wangnoo SK, Chowdhury S, Rao PV. Treating to target in type 2 diabetes: the BEGIN trial programme. J Assoc Physicians India. 2014;62(1 Suppl):21-26.
- Leva® Pelvic Health System. Backed by Science, leva® is Proven to Work. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://www.levatherapy.com/hcps/clinical-results
- Weinstein MM, Dunivan G, Guaderrama NM, Richter HE. Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(4):606-615. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725
- Weinstein MM, Dunivan GC, Guaderrama NM, Richter HE. Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Longitudinal Analysis at 6 and 12 Months. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(1):199-206. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005036
- Luminopia®. The first FDA-approved binocular therapy for amblyopia. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://luminopia.com
- Xiao S, Gaier ED, Mazow ML, et al. Improved adherence and treatment outcomes with an engaging, personalized digital therapeutic in amblyopia. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8328. Published 2020 May 20. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65234-3
- Xiao S, Gaier ED, Wu HC, et al. Digital therapeutic improves visual acuity and encourages high adherence in amblyopic children in open-label pilot study. J AAPOS. 2021;25(2):87.e1-87.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.11.022
- Xiao S, Angjeli E, Wu HC, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dichoptic Digital Therapeutic for Amblyopia [published correction appears in Ophthalmology. 2022 May;129(5):593]. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(1):77-85. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.001
- MahanaTM. Meet the First FDA-Cleared CBT Digital Therapeutic for IBS. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://www.mahana.com/treatments/providers
- Everitt HA, Landau S, O’Reilly G, et al. Assessing telephone-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and web-delivered CBT versus treatment as usual in irritable bowel syndrome (ACTIB): a multicentre randomised trial. Gut. 2019;68(9):1613-1623. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317805
- Everitt HA, Landau S, O’Reilly G, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for irritable bowel syndrome: 24-month follow-up of participants in the ACTIB randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(11):863-872. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30243-2
- NightWareTM. Take Sleep Back. Move Life Forward. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://nightware.com
- Stephan JT, Davenport N, Evans-Lindquist MK, Hiltner RK, Karlin DR. An open-label study of treating traumatic nightmares with an investigational smartwatch based system. Sleep. 2020;43(Suppl 1):A457.
- Davenport ND, Werner JK. A randomized sham-controlled clinical trial of a novel wearable intervention for trauma-related nightmares in military veterans. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(2):361-369. doi:10.5664/jcsm.10338
- Regulora®. Rethink IBS pain: Now there’s a digital solution for IBS abdominal pain. Accessed January 24, 2024. https://regulora.com/about-regulora
- Berry SK, Berry R, Recker D, Botbyl J, Pun L, Chey WD. A Randomized Parallel-group Study of Digital Gut-directed Hypnotherapy vs Muscle Relaxation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(12):3152-3159.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.015
- RelieVRxTM. Take control of your chronic lower back pain. Accessed January 24, 2024. https://www.relievrx.com
- Garcia LM, Birckhead BJ, Krishnamurthy P, et al. An 8-Week Self-Administered At-Home Behavioral Skills-Based Virtual Reality Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Conducted During COVID-19. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e26292. Published 2021 Feb 22. doi:10.2196/26292
- Garcia L, Birckhead B, Krishnamurthy P, et al. Durability of the Treatment Effects of an 8-Week Self-administered Home-Based Virtual Reality Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: 6-Month Follow-up Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial [published correction appears in J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 8;24(6):e40038]. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(5):e37480. Published 2022 May 25. doi:10.2196/37480
- Maddox T, Garcia H, Ffrench K, et al. In-home virtual reality program for chronic low back pain: durability of a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to 18 months post-treatment. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published online November 25, 2022. doi:10.1136/rapm-2022-104093