Authors:
Sophia Dietrich, PharmD
Michael W. Nagy, PharmD, BCACP

Reviewers:
Dawn Fuke, PharmD, BCPS
Lisa Palmisano, PharmD, BCACP

Citation: Mackenzie IS, Ford I, Nuki G, et al. Long-term cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with gout (FAST): a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2020; S0140-6736(20): 32240-0.

The Problem:

We know gout is among the many comorbidities that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).1,2 In 2018, the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in patients with gout and cardiovascular morbidities (CARES) trial concluded that febuxostat was non-inferior to allopurinol.3 BUT, two of the secondary endpoints of CARES were very concerning — febuxostat was inferior to allopurinol in terms of cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. Many clinicians were left wondering whether febuxostat was cardiotoxic …. or conversely, perhaps allopurinol was cardioprotective. The 2020 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guidelines for the Management of Gout recommends allopurinol as first line lowering urate lowering therapy (ULT) over febuxostat.3,4 Given the difficulty of interpreting the CARES trial results, ACR recommends switching febuxostat therapy to another ULT in patients with a history of CVD or who experience a new CVD event. Unfortunately, alternatives to allopurinol are limited. Therefore, more data regarding the cardiovascular effects of xanthine oxidase inhibitors is crucial before ruling out febuxostat for a large portion of the population. Will another cardiovascular outcome trial provide greater clarity to guide clinical practice?

This content has been restricted to logged-in users only. Please login to view this content.